stock M62 times
#11
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
94 is also the OBD Bastard child, and nobody in their right mind would run a 2.2" pulley on a 94/95. 2.5 is the smallest so far, and for good reason. 92/93 can go to 2.2.
#15
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![BonnedGP is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by jwikoff99
Of course it would be worth it. For reliability and diagnostic sake, I suggest a 93, with a 94 SC and TB, with an air/fuel calibrator.
It'* going into a 92. That'* why i was asking about the computers. If the bonne i get a hold of is OBD I then i won't really have to screw with anything, but OBDII and i'm pretty sure i'll have to have the thing reprogrammed, which is no biggy. Just curious on the whole thing
#18
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Farmington, Minnesota =MWBF '05 SURVIVOR= =CEBF '06 SURVIVOR= =August '06 COTM=
Posts: 9,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![LakevilleSSEi is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was just at one of the MNCGP guys house yesterday that did a * II into a 94 GP SE
#20
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
High 14'* in a Series 1 L67 is a little too optimistic IMO.... I'd expect 15.5 with a good driver/launch, in 100% stock form.