MAF Thoughts
#1
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Home Sweet Home in New York
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MAF Thoughts
So... I've been thinking about the great things Willwren has been doing with increasing flow and the probability that we're outflowing our MAF sensor. I know there'* aftermarket solutions out there for the Series 2 engine.
Has anyone found anything for the Series 1? I did find one that will work for 94-06 GM: http://www.jetchip.com/products.asp?...&model=591#591
This isn't for me right now, just thinking about the future.
Has anyone found anything for the Series 1? I did find one that will work for 94-06 GM: http://www.jetchip.com/products.asp?...&model=591#591
This isn't for me right now, just thinking about the future.
#2
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bolingbrook, IL Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Their is no way any series 1 is outflowing the MAF. Also on the MAF'* you can basically use any MAF out their you just have to put a different MAF table into the PCM.
#5
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS
Expert Gearhead
I'd research the effect of the sensor on the overall engine performance before considering changin it. Each input to the pcm changes many other things when factored into the programming.
#6
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Morty, that MAF sensor is for applications that have the MAF sensor 'divorced' from the TB. It will not work for cars that have the MAF IN the TB.
Please be careful how you word things. You make it sound in your initial post in this topic that I've made reference or claims to outflowing the MAF sensor. This simply is NOT the case. The GEN3 SC does flow beyond the range of the 92/93 MAF, but not the MAF it'* DESIGNED for. Even with my 2.2" pulley and ported LIM/EMs, I'm not 'outflowing' anything.
Please be careful how you word things. You make it sound in your initial post in this topic that I've made reference or claims to outflowing the MAF sensor. This simply is NOT the case. The GEN3 SC does flow beyond the range of the 92/93 MAF, but not the MAF it'* DESIGNED for. Even with my 2.2" pulley and ported LIM/EMs, I'm not 'outflowing' anything.
#7
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Home Sweet Home in New York
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by willwren
Morty, that MAF sensor is for applications that have the MAF sensor 'divorced' from the TB. It will not work for cars that have the MAF IN the TB.
Please be careful how you word things. You make it sound in your initial post in this topic that I've made reference or claims to outflowing the MAF sensor. This simply is NOT the case. The GEN3 SC does flow beyond the range of the 92/93 MAF, but not the MAF it'* DESIGNED for. Even with my 2.2" pulley and ported LIM/EMs, I'm not 'outflowing' anything.
Please be careful how you word things. You make it sound in your initial post in this topic that I've made reference or claims to outflowing the MAF sensor. This simply is NOT the case. The GEN3 SC does flow beyond the range of the 92/93 MAF, but not the MAF it'* DESIGNED for. Even with my 2.2" pulley and ported LIM/EMs, I'm not 'outflowing' anything.
#8
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bolingbrook, IL Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Morty, that MAF sensor is for applications that have the MAF sensor 'divorced' from the TB. It will not work for cars that have the MAF IN the TB.
#9
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS
Expert Gearhead
Originally Posted by llBlazin_llLo
Morty, that MAF sensor is for applications that have the MAF sensor 'divorced' from the TB. It will not work for cars that have the MAF IN the TB.
The both read flow. Maybe there can be slight gains...honestly..99% of the people on this forum aren't into performance enough to warrant it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post