Jet Stage 2 and MemCAL incompatibility
#14
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![griff1455 is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Tinkering didn;t happen on Labor Day. No, it wasn;t the fiance, it was good ole Dad. So the port matching and KS will have to wait until next Thursday. :(
However, when I retuned home this week, there it was. The newly reprogrammed JET chip. I installed it this afternoon and just came back from a drive. It is now much more responsive than before. Since nothing else has been done, I have to assume that it is due to the reprogramming. Still have the EM'* to do before the 2.2 pulley goes back on.
My advice, if you are running a JET chip, I would get your MEMCAL rev and call them to verify if their'* was written for that version or not. It made enough of a difference for me that I was glad I did it. I haven;t scanned yet, but will soon. I suspect the KR will still be present at WOT until I get the EM'* done.
However, when I retuned home this week, there it was. The newly reprogrammed JET chip. I installed it this afternoon and just came back from a drive. It is now much more responsive than before. Since nothing else has been done, I have to assume that it is due to the reprogramming. Still have the EM'* to do before the 2.2 pulley goes back on.
My advice, if you are running a JET chip, I would get your MEMCAL rev and call them to verify if their'* was written for that version or not. It made enough of a difference for me that I was glad I did it. I haven;t scanned yet, but will soon. I suspect the KR will still be present at WOT until I get the EM'* done.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hans
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
2
07-16-2007 11:20 AM
willwren
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
36
11-21-2002 02:52 AM
willwren
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
2
10-23-2002 11:06 AM