Gut a 87-91 airbox?
#11
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
also, have you ever heard of anyone running without an air filter? one of my friends does that, i keep telling him, that really is not a good idea....but he has run like that for like 2000 miles..he said he gets better performance...whacko
#13
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i am gonna laugh soo hard when the one day i don't see him driving, hes gonna tell me he killed his intake cause something big got in there...or it will be something stupid like he will get a leaf on the MAF sensor blocking it and he will stall..HAA that will be SOOO funny!!@@$#$@!
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 87-91 Box is really not restrictive... But the intake I stuck on mine sure did seem to help the low end torque, and just made the car more dirveable...LOL ![Wink](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/wink.gif)
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
![Wink](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/wink.gif)
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#15
Senior Member
True Car Nut
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There'* really no engine, NA or not that, can't benefit from better air throughput. That'* what the SC is all about, after all. Of course at some point you have to improve the rest of the throughput restrictions.
![Wink](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
egladman
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
21
02-20-2008 03:10 AM