No more GTO?
#23
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Boreas is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So the GTO is going to be improved right? Will it look like its name too? Cus you know, the recent stylings coming out from GM leaves somethign to be desired by a margin wider than the Atlantic ocean. Impala, Lucerne anyone? Same uninspiring, cookie cutter design prevalent during the 90'*, and im SICK of it.
#26
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Phelps, NY
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Doppleganger is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by bandit
if they made the new GTO look like this one i would by one
They shoulda learned from Dodge (Challenger).
#27
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Puddy46 is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I may be the odd man out here, but I don't understand why it seems like nobody liked the car simply because it didn't look like a 69 Judge, and looks too much like a GP. SO WHAT?! If I recall correctly, the first year or so of the original GTO'* weren't exactly wild and whooly looking either. That logic is like saying that you don't like the M3 because it looks too much like a 5 series. Where else are you going to find a track proven car with 400hp for under $35,000? Exactly....
I guess I'm just looking at it from a numbers point of view instead of a vanity point of view.
/end rant
I guess I'm just looking at it from a numbers point of view instead of a vanity point of view.
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
/end rant
#28
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Puddy your right the GTO was based off a Tempest! A grandma car that in 61 one you could get a Trophy 4 and a 2 speed automatic, it came from humble orgins!
I liked the GTO a sleeper and power maker basically a baragin M3!
![Laughing](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Wink](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#29
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Quincy, Ma
Posts: 15,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Gumball is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Puddy46
I may be the odd man out here, but I don't understand why it seems like nobody liked the car simply because it didn't look like a 69 Judge
looking more of an american sport car in general.
it is just to small.
#30
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Gumball
Originally Posted by Puddy46
I may be the odd man out here, but I don't understand why it seems like nobody liked the car simply because it didn't look like a 69 Judge
looking more of an american sport car in general.
it is just to small.
I can't handle the notorious plastic look of newer GM cars. To make things worse, the 09 Camaro has AWEFUL styling cues coupled with monster truck rims.
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)