Is this right? I burn gas.
#1
Senior Member
![](https://www.gmforum.com/images/ranks/veteran_marine_corp.png)
Thread Starter
#2
Senior Member
![](/images/badges/Gearhead.png)
![](/images/badges/SuperMod.png)
True Car Nut
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Attached a .PDF of the article for future generations after the link dies.
The following users liked this post:
carfixer007 (01-31-2024)
#3
Senior Member
![](/images/badges/Gearhead.png)
![](/images/badges/SuperMod.png)
True Car Nut
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Let'* see: $1,400.00 divided by 7,000 miles equals $0.20 per mile.
My 1997 LeSabre just got a new set of 60,000 mile Continental tires for $600.00 out the door. If they last 50,000 miles, then that'* $0.012 per mile
My math says that is 6% of the price per mile versus the Tesla in the article.
I have heard this is an issue. I guess when something is really heavy, has skinny low-rolling-resistance tires, instant torque, and gets driven around in city conditions, they wear somewhat faster for some reason.
My 1997 LeSabre just got a new set of 60,000 mile Continental tires for $600.00 out the door. If they last 50,000 miles, then that'* $0.012 per mile
My math says that is 6% of the price per mile versus the Tesla in the article.
I have heard this is an issue. I guess when something is really heavy, has skinny low-rolling-resistance tires, instant torque, and gets driven around in city conditions, they wear somewhat faster for some reason.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ComfyCar
General GM Chat
29
07-18-2005 02:04 AM