TURBO 87-91 no, REALLY!!
#4
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Originally Posted by Sol
That'* really sweet. But only a 15.9 sec 1/4? I'd expect more in a turbo'ed V6 that was based off of the GN engine.
#6
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well that turbo added about 50 hp. That means it makes a bigger difference than a ser 2 supercharger but considering that this motor is only good for 165 stock, and it doesnt say that there were any cam or exhaust/intake mods, I'de say that 215 isn't too shabby. A l67 swap would be more practical though. Imagine how fast the tranny would break in this car
#9
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sol
Those old trannys are beasts though. What kind of compression did those old 3800'* have?
#10
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halifax, Canada 91SSE / 97SSEi
Posts: 5,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting.... very interesting....
Do you have a larger version of that article, one that'* easier to read?
If you do... can you email me the JPG.
I can then post the full res one here....
Thanks
Do you have a larger version of that article, one that'* easier to read?
If you do... can you email me the JPG.
I can then post the full res one here....
Thanks