Series 1 l67 Dyno Numbers
#11
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by petraman
Originally Posted by willwren
225hp, 260tq at the crank
resist....
correction....
![Laughing](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
#12
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I almost wanted to say something, but I figured someone with a gen 2 series 1 would perk up.
But did the gen one series one change to the gen 2 at the same time as the bonneville did? just curious.
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
But did the gen one series one change to the gen 2 at the same time as the bonneville did? just curious.
#13
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The problem is that I own two with different specs. Series 1 L67'* are split. 92/93 are the same (more or less) and 94/95 are identical.
92/93 are 205hp, 260tq (92'* are thought to be a tiny bit less)
94/95 are 225hp, 275tq
The numbers are decieving if you only look at the hp, and don't look at what rpm'* the torque peaks at. Then it starts getting impressive. The Series 1 L67'* peak torque at a VERY low RPM, even when compared to the S2 L67.
92/93 are 205hp, 260tq (92'* are thought to be a tiny bit less)
94/95 are 225hp, 275tq
The numbers are decieving if you only look at the hp, and don't look at what rpm'* the torque peaks at. Then it starts getting impressive. The Series 1 L67'* peak torque at a VERY low RPM, even when compared to the S2 L67.
#15
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![1993 SLE is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by J Wikoff
92'* were thought to be less when we thought 93 L67s had roller rockers, but they don't.
#16
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Even the non-roller rockers are different between 92 and 93. Some other minor differences we're aware of, such as pistons (that were produced for the factory) even though replacements are now the same.
92'* have never seemed to respond to the same mods in the same way as 93'*.
92'* have never seemed to respond to the same mods in the same way as 93'*.
#17
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The rockers were only different to allow the bolt size change so all 93'* could use the same heads.
Maybe I'm blind to some of the 92/93 things, but from what I see, they are typically the same in how they respond, IMO.
Maybe I'm blind to some of the 92/93 things, but from what I see, they are typically the same in how they respond, IMO.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dirtracr95
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
14
04-12-2008 02:40 PM
JimmyFloyd
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
13
09-04-2006 01:00 PM
DJ SHO
General GM Chat
13
05-07-2005 12:15 AM
DJ SHO
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
7
07-19-2004 03:39 PM