to Fram or not to Fram.
#1
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've been looking for ways to boost MPG and the cars are in need of air filters.
I could get Fram Air Hogs (similar to K&N) for next to nothing with rebate.
Got a K&N in the 87 Supra and love it. So what have I got to loose?
Here'* what I've read about oiled cotton filters.
* The oils will get on the MAF and screw with the readings.
* You'll get better throttle response and sound but you may get PCM error codes.
* Mileage improvement is questionable and it needs recharging every 18 months.
Anyone running K&N'* or Air Hogs?
I could get Fram Air Hogs (similar to K&N) for next to nothing with rebate.
Got a K&N in the 87 Supra and love it. So what have I got to loose?
Here'* what I've read about oiled cotton filters.
* The oils will get on the MAF and screw with the readings.
* You'll get better throttle response and sound but you may get PCM error codes.
* Mileage improvement is questionable and it needs recharging every 18 months.
Anyone running K&N'* or Air Hogs?
#2
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: burb of detroit. 2 miles north of 8 mile Rd.
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![samueljackson is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i have a drop in k&n. one in my buick and one in my olds. ive never had any maf issues. i think you would have to put way too much oil for that to be an issue. a light coating is all thats needed.
as far as performance or mpg, ehh cant really tell. personally i like the k&n better bc you get a lifetime warranty, and i have more faith in them than fram.
as far as performance or mpg, ehh cant really tell. personally i like the k&n better bc you get a lifetime warranty, and i have more faith in them than fram.
#3
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: August 07 COTM....NEBF '06, CEBF '06 OHMM '06 ONBF '07 CEBF '07
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![PRD2BDF is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I use a KN drop in. It hasn't been serviced yet because I haven't reached their service interval yet but I havent had any problems.
Like Wes said, I have more faith in KN, they've been around for a long time while the Fram Airhog is still too new for me.
Like Wes said, I have more faith in KN, they've been around for a long time while the Fram Airhog is still too new for me.
#4
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Ryno02 is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ive used a drop in k&n in my 92 olds, "FIPK II" cold air on my '97 fireturd, and currently have an intense FWI with the K&N bigarse cone it comes with. never had any problems. saw definite performance improvement with the intakes, slight improvement on the drop in. i think its worth it just because you dont have to keep on buying new air filters.
![Cool](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
#6
Senior Member
Posts like a Supercharger
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Zelienople, Pennsylvania
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![White93z34 is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I used to run a k/n drop in one of my cars before, never noticed any real difference in MPG or power, i ended up going back to a decent paper puroilator filter.
Personally I would not waste the money, but thats just my .02 cents.
Personally I would not waste the money, but thats just my .02 cents.
#7
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Mopar MAN is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My experience has been that drop-ins in general aren't going to give you any real gains. On almost every car I've seen, it'* the actual tubing to and from the air-filter box that are the major restriction. But the cone types do give some nice improvements.
My Duster saw about a 3hp gain going to a cone right on the throttle body, plus about a 1mpg gain as well. I had a Dreamspeed CAI on my old Avenger, and gained a real 5hp with that, but no MPG increase. My Grand Voyager gained at least 1.5MPG with a short tube and a cone, and made a noticable gain in high-RPM power.
My Duster saw about a 3hp gain going to a cone right on the throttle body, plus about a 1mpg gain as well. I had a Dreamspeed CAI on my old Avenger, and gained a real 5hp with that, but no MPG increase. My Grand Voyager gained at least 1.5MPG with a short tube and a cone, and made a noticable gain in high-RPM power.
#8
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: S. Maine
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![4carb is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Got one in wifeys SSei. Noticed a difference at first, probably due to the paper filter that was in it being quite dirty.
I like the fact that I can clean it and put it back in.
![Laughing](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
#10
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I usually use Purolator air filters but I guess you can't beat Free so its worth a try to go with the Air Hog, theres nothing to loose.