Bonne GXP vs. Chrysler 300C test
#1
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![5.3Avalanche is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...tml?page=4&c=y
I personally think that there was something wrong with the bonne used in this test. 0-60 in 6.95 is dreadfully slow. Mine runs about 6.4'* with 91 octane. Good test in all though. Shows that the bonne can really dominate in the twisties. So much for that ~mercedes~ chassis.
I personally think that there was something wrong with the bonne used in this test. 0-60 in 6.95 is dreadfully slow. Mine runs about 6.4'* with 91 octane. Good test in all though. Shows that the bonne can really dominate in the twisties. So much for that ~mercedes~ chassis.
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#2
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![1993 SLE is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the 300C can walk the GXP,
it has been verifed with a member that has a SSEI totally stock. and the 300c walked the SSEi the GXP is slower than the SSEi
not a hater of any kind......thought i would throw that in there to be safe
it has been verifed with a member that has a SSEI totally stock. and the 300c walked the SSEi the GXP is slower than the SSEi
not a hater of any kind......thought i would throw that in there to be safe
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Laughing](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
#5
Senior Member
True Car Nut
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
300 C'* dont impress me...
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#6
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lets hope not considering GM intends to do that will all their lux cars shortly (they gave it a go, but didnt work out to well in prototype cars) but they think they perfected it now.
Northstar powered cars have something similar, yet its used in situations where the engine tries to save itself. Fuel gets cut off to 4 cylinders and its called Limp Home mode.
As for styling, the new 300'* are oh so very "love or hate" cars. I personally hate the new styling. In my book the GXP looks far and away a better car. Had Chrysler dropped the V8 HEMI powered RWD into the 2000-2004 300M, I'd be all over like flies in ****
Oh well.
Northstar powered cars have something similar, yet its used in situations where the engine tries to save itself. Fuel gets cut off to 4 cylinders and its called Limp Home mode.
As for styling, the new 300'* are oh so very "love or hate" cars. I personally hate the new styling. In my book the GXP looks far and away a better car. Had Chrysler dropped the V8 HEMI powered RWD into the 2000-2004 300M, I'd be all over like flies in ****
Oh well.
#7
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
Posts: 7,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![SSsuperchargedEi is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Jim W
Lets hope not considering GM intends to do that will all their lux cars shortly (they gave it a go, but didnt work out to well in prototype cars) but they think they perfected it now.
Northstar powered cars have something similar, yet its used in situations where the engine tries to save itself. Fuel gets cut off to 4 cylinders and its called Limp Home mode.
As for styling, the new 300'* are oh so very "love or hate" cars. I personally hate the new styling. In my book the GXP looks far and away a better car. Had Chrysler dropped the V8 HEMI powered RWD into the 2000-2004 300M, I'd be all over like flies in ****
Oh well.
Northstar powered cars have something similar, yet its used in situations where the engine tries to save itself. Fuel gets cut off to 4 cylinders and its called Limp Home mode.
As for styling, the new 300'* are oh so very "love or hate" cars. I personally hate the new styling. In my book the GXP looks far and away a better car. Had Chrysler dropped the V8 HEMI powered RWD into the 2000-2004 300M, I'd be all over like flies in ****
Oh well.
#8
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Indeed it did, however when I tested several M Specials (btw wicked car..wow!) it just lacked that extra...umph that I get from the Aurora).
It would be a dangerous car (literally) with an SRT engine though!
It would be a dangerous car (literally) with an SRT engine though!
#9
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Motor City(ish)
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![bonkjmma is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just watched a show on Speed the other night that compared the new GTO to a few other cars. One of the comparisons was a 2005 GXP. Their best 1/4 run with the GXP was 14.36 @ ?? mph.... Don't remember the trap speed but I do remember the ET......