1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Who else replaced thier fuel sending unit at 136K

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2005 | 11:41 AM
  #1  
Rockford's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Rockford is on a distinguished road
Default Who else replaced thier fuel sending unit at 136K

My dad has a 92 olds 88 that he had to replace his fuel sending unit on at 136k. My mom had a 92 buick lesabre that needed a new sending unit at 136k, After she wrecked that one one my dad got her another 92 and shortly after hiting 136k the sending unit needed to be replaced, my brother got a 92 olds 88 last year with 135k and not 1 week after hitting 136k it was in the shop for a new sending unit. Now i just purchased a 92 bonneville with 136k and am now in the process of replaceing the sending unit, now has anyone else had this problem or is it just my bad luck?
Old 03-23-2005 | 11:45 AM
  #2  
J Wikoff's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,433
Likes: 2
J Wikoff is on a distinguished road
Default

That'* wierd. A bigger problem with 92'* is the original fuel strainer on the pump (something like a 9 dollar part) is too short and can't get fuel when low on right hand turns. Was that the problem? If so, your mechanic was charging you to replace the wrong part.
Old 03-23-2005 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
SSsuperchargedEi's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,551
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa.
SSsuperchargedEi is on a distinguished road
Default

had mine done at 80k
Old 03-23-2005 | 12:00 PM
  #4  
vital49's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 5
From: Purgatory
vital49 is on a distinguished road
Default

That'* weird!

My old 93 had 180K on the original. I'm at 105K on my 99 and it'* still doing well. The 87 Bonnie that I had a couple years ago had 228K on the original!

A lot has to do with how full you keep the tank. Not running the tank bone dry is the secret to long fuel pump life. The fuel acts as a lubricant to the pump. Low fuel = less lube!
Old 03-23-2005 | 05:17 PM
  #5  
96LeSabre's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Western New York State
96LeSabre is on a distinguished road
Default

I replaced mine at 96K along with the tank and pump. This was just about a week ago.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gigion
1992-1999
17
09-08-2007 09:44 PM
96LeSabre
1992-1999
1
02-24-2005 05:29 PM
vital49
1992-1999
8
01-26-2005 09:19 PM
eds2000bonn
2000-2005
5
08-06-2004 12:19 AM
dmcfan
1992-1999
2
05-13-2004 03:20 PM



Quick Reply: Who else replaced thier fuel sending unit at 136K



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM.