Stuck lifter?
#81
Retired Senior Admin
![](/images/badges/Gearhead.png)
Expert Gearhead
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes
on
25 Posts
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ya, that would explain the slightly lower flow. So L67 injectors should come in around 30 pounds. I don't suggest going any larger then that because then your under driving the injectors. I ran my L67 injectors up to 98% before I upgraded to 42.5#
#82
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Lenox, IL
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![xtremerevolution is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A guy on the w-body forum mentioned I shouldn't go above 80%. Is there a danger to running as high as I'm running right now? 93% duty cycle is pretty high.
#84
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Lenox, IL
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![xtremerevolution is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
5285 RPM
93.1% Injector Duty Cycle
11.6 AFR
5306 RPM
93.3% Injector Duty Cycle
11.9 AFR
5221 RPM
92.7% Injector Duty Cycle
11.8 AFR
KR was at around 5 at each of those points, if that matters at all.
#85
Retired Senior Admin
![](/images/badges/Gearhead.png)
Expert Gearhead
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes
on
25 Posts
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
To many cars to remember all the details. This was a top swap right? If so, that AFR is correct and no need to change injectors. If this is a NA car, then it'* lean and you might run out of injector. I would deal with getting a good tune and deal with one thing at a time.
#86
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Lenox, IL
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![xtremerevolution is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
To many cars to remember all the details. This was a top swap right? If so, that AFR is correct and no need to change injectors. If this is a NA car, then it'* lean and you might run out of injector. I would deal with getting a good tune and deal with one thing at a time.
#88
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Lenox, IL
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![xtremerevolution is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
How do you figure that an AFR of almost 12 is too lean for an N/A engine? I thought in regard to power. 12.9:1 is the best ratio.
#89
Retired Senior Admin
![](/images/badges/Gearhead.png)
Expert Gearhead
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes
on
25 Posts
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Danthurs is a name known to all](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_highpos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just did some checking and yep, your right. When I was much younger 10.9:1 was where people would shoot. Now I see that'* all different. 13.0:1 for a NA car, even as high as 13.5:1 That opens up a lot of room on your injectors.
#90
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Lenox, IL
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![xtremerevolution is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yeah. That would imply that I'm running way too rich as it is, so if I eliminate knock and get to 12.5 (which is what I'd aim for), I should be good to go.