Engine Rebuild
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![jonmykel is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hello everyone I am new to this site. I recently puchase a 92 SSEi with 162,000 miles on it. After about a day driving it developed a knock and the oil pressure droped. Figuring that the engine spun a bearing I decieded to rebuild it. I have pulled the engine out of the car and will do a complete rebuild on it. My question are there any modifications I should consider making to the engine for more horse power and perfomace while I have the engine apart. I would like it to remain a daily driver so nothing to drastic.
#2
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You bet! The least you should do is port and polish the heads. Also, if you have the equipment available, weld the outside flanges of the exhaust/manifold/headers to the pipes, and use a die grinder to clean up the factory welds on the inside. Look in there, you'll see what I mean.
Here'* a link to a DIY head port and polish site:
http://www.sa-motorsports.com/diyguide.shtm
Here'* a link to a DIY head port and polish site:
http://www.sa-motorsports.com/diyguide.shtm
#3
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![DeathRat is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by jonmykel
Hello everyone I am new to this site. I recently puchase a 92 SSEi with 162,000 miles on it. After about a day driving it developed a knock and the oil pressure droped. Figuring that the engine spun a bearing I decieded to rebuild it. I have pulled the engine out of the car and will do a complete rebuild on it. My question are there any modifications I should consider making to the engine for more horse power and perfomace while I have the engine apart. I would like it to remain a daily driver so nothing to drastic.
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![jonmykel is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I did take it to two shop in my area to evaluate the problem. Both shops concluded the same proplem that I did and suggested I trash the car because to fix it would not be worth the money. They did not feet the car was as cool as I do. Also with 162,000 miles on the engine I wanted to rebuild it anyways. I did not go into the evaluation process in my first post because I did not see the value in all that writing. Do you have any suggestions to my original request as to what mods I should look at. Thank you all for your response.
Please limit your replies to helpfull suggestions not self elevatiing ones.
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Roll Eyes](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#5
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![DeathRat is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I didn't mean offense to you personally. I've just too many pull an engine w/o any diagnosics first as to the real problem. If your car'* engine was finished, then that'* fine.
As to your original question, try P&P'ng the Lower Intake & Cylinder Heads & TB. How about a new SC? Better flowing exhaust?
As to your original question, try P&P'ng the Lower Intake & Cylinder Heads & TB. How about a new SC? Better flowing exhaust?
![Twisted Evil](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![jonmykel is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Rat thanks for your response I can understand your position. Thanks for the suggestions. Willwren suggested the P&P on the heads and posted a link to some good info on the subject. That appears to be the way to go on the heads. I am curious about your suggestion about a new SC. I read the info on FLOZ and want to stay clear of that nest. Is there real value in a new SC or maybe some work on my old one. I took it off last night and inspected it there does not seem to be much wear, although I can not tell much about bearings and tolerences by looking at the outside, it appears to be in good condition. What can you or anyone else out there tell me about a reduced pully. I measured mine last night but did not know were the ref. point was, is it the bottom of the groves the top of the groves or the overall outside diameter. The SC is one of reasons I bought the car and would like to up the boost. Is there any type of intercooler available?
#7
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Do your lower intake while you're doing the heads. Otherwise it'* somewhat self-defeating (good recovery, btw to both of you
)
I'd put that sucker back together first. Once it'* running, test for boost. If you get at least 8psi at wot in gear (under load) and closer to 9 in cold weather, you're fine on the SC ifyou have no 'rattle' at idle. If it rattles at idle, change the coupler for 30 bucks. It'* easy to go back and change the SC later. Worry about the engine itself first. If you do need another, Canadian Supercharger is highly recommended. Best prices, and second only to Eaton/Magnusson in product. Proven performers in our cars. Your pulley is 2.55". Measure from the belt face, ignore the grooves. www.pulleyboys.com is your source, but test your engine and SC under boost first. You don't want to run the smaller pulley during break-in anyway.
![Wink](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
I'd put that sucker back together first. Once it'* running, test for boost. If you get at least 8psi at wot in gear (under load) and closer to 9 in cold weather, you're fine on the SC ifyou have no 'rattle' at idle. If it rattles at idle, change the coupler for 30 bucks. It'* easy to go back and change the SC later. Worry about the engine itself first. If you do need another, Canadian Supercharger is highly recommended. Best prices, and second only to Eaton/Magnusson in product. Proven performers in our cars. Your pulley is 2.55". Measure from the belt face, ignore the grooves. www.pulleyboys.com is your source, but test your engine and SC under boost first. You don't want to run the smaller pulley during break-in anyway.
#8
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![DeathRat is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by jonmykel
Rat thanks for your response I can understand your position. Thanks for the suggestions. Willwren suggested the P&P on the heads and posted a link to some good info on the subject. That appears to be the way to go on the heads. I am curious about your suggestion about a new SC. I read the info on FLOZ and want to stay clear of that nest. Is there real value in a new SC or maybe some work on my old one. I took it off last night and inspected it there does not seem to be much wear, although I can not tell much about bearings and tolerences by looking at the outside, it appears to be in good condition. What can you or anyone else out there tell me about a reduced pully. I measured mine last night but did not know were the ref. point was, is it the bottom of the groves the top of the groves or the overall outside diameter. The SC is one of reasons I bought the car and would like to up the boost. Is there any type of intercooler available?
![Wink](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Twisted Evil](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
![Cool](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![jonmykel is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I case anyone was curious I found the problem last night on my engine. Just as suspected number 3 rod bearing was spun.
The crank shaft looks pretty bad probably needs replacing I don't think I can salvage it. I am very suprised at the condition of the engine. There is not any oil build up and the cylinders are in excellent condition. You would not think there was 100,000 mile on it let alone 167,000. Anyone know if there was a different crank in the SC engine from the non SC. Looking for a good crank don't want to spend a fortune.
![Crying or Very sad](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Bash](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/bash.gif)
#10
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![DeathRat is on a distinguished road](https://www.gmforum.com/images/reputation/reputation_pos.gif)
![Default](https://www.gmforum.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by jonmykel
I case anyone was curious I found the problem last night on my engine. Just as suspected number 3 rod bearing was spun.
The crank shaft looks pretty bad probably needs replacing I don't think I can salvage it. I am very suprised at the condition of the engine. There is not any oil build up and the cylinders are in excellent condition. You would not think there was 100,000 mile on it let alone 167,000. Anyone know if there was a different crank in the SC engine from the non SC. Looking for a good crank don't want to spend a fortune. ![Bash](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/bash.gif)
![Crying or Very sad](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Bash](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/bash.gif)
![Wink](https://www.gmforum.com/gm/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slgarner3
2000-2005
5
10-15-2009 07:25 AM
rocketman
1987-1991
10
10-30-2003 09:57 PM