97 SE in the shop.... mechanic stumped *updated*
#1
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brick Town
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
97 SE in the shop.... mechanic stumped *updated*
Car runs OK till it gets hot then starts hesitating big time. That lasts for a few seconds then the car idles down and just dies. Starts up no problem but only for a second or two then dies again. Funny thing tho, it makes a weird scraping sound when it dies as if the engine is being turned in the opposite direction. After it cools down again it runs fine but eventually acts the same as it heats up. THe whole time there is a funny whirring noise coming from the airbox area. Brand new fuel pump, filter, strainer, wires, LIM, UIM. THe car is showing codes for MAP and crank sensor. ??????? vacuum leak perhaps. Will a scanner pick that up?
#2
are you sure you mean MAP and not MAF? just making sure you mean Manifold Absolute Pressure sensor or do you mean Mass Air Flow sensor? I am wondering because you said near the airbox area, and that would mean MAF to me, but then again the MAF is not a mechanical sensor, so that is a little odd.
but MAP does sound possibly right. it could be that the MAP sensor is acting up when its hot and not reading the vacuum pressure correctly? this sounds...kinda right, being that the MAP does control fuel flow and could be causing the engine to stall.
although I do know the crank sensor can act up when the engine is hot when it starts to fail, and the MAP would control fuel flow in conjunction with other sensors...so I would say replace both if its giving you a code.
but MAP does sound possibly right. it could be that the MAP sensor is acting up when its hot and not reading the vacuum pressure correctly? this sounds...kinda right, being that the MAP does control fuel flow and could be causing the engine to stall.
although I do know the crank sensor can act up when the engine is hot when it starts to fail, and the MAP would control fuel flow in conjunction with other sensors...so I would say replace both if its giving you a code.
#3
Here are the part links from Checker just to save you some time.
I personally have heard some problems and have experienced problems with the GP Sorensen sensors from checker/advance so I gave yah the links to the Niehoff ones instead.
MAP SENSOR
CRANK SENSOR
I personally have heard some problems and have experienced problems with the GP Sorensen sensors from checker/advance so I gave yah the links to the Niehoff ones instead.
MAP SENSOR
CRANK SENSOR
#4
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wjcollier07
....this sounds...kinda right, being that the MAP does control fuel flow and could be causing the engine to stall.
#5
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Please give us the number designators of the actual codes being pulled from the PCM. That would help narrow things down.
I think if there were a vacuum leak the car would be hard to start. Has your mechanic tried swapping a known good MAP sensor onto the car? Honestly, I don't know how much the MAP figures into the PCM equation for fuel, timing, etc. In general, though, it sounds like the car might be running fine in open loop (when the PCM uses preset data), then having trouble in closed loop (when the PCM bases engine operation on sensor input). I would suspect some kind of sensor failure in this case.
I think if there were a vacuum leak the car would be hard to start. Has your mechanic tried swapping a known good MAP sensor onto the car? Honestly, I don't know how much the MAP figures into the PCM equation for fuel, timing, etc. In general, though, it sounds like the car might be running fine in open loop (when the PCM uses preset data), then having trouble in closed loop (when the PCM bases engine operation on sensor input). I would suspect some kind of sensor failure in this case.
#7
Senior Member
True Car Nut
You said the engine is making a weird noise. Have you checked out the harmonic balancer?
And to rule out the maf, unplug it and see if it runs better. It will just use the map.
And to rule out the maf, unplug it and see if it runs better. It will just use the map.
#8
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brick Town
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to the mechanic it was the MAF sensor that caused the car to break down. The MAP was bad too, and there was a vacuum leak somewhere. Car runs better than ever. Much much faster than it ever has been.
About the MAF... mine was bad for months I was just too lazy to replace it. Then I bought one on ebay that was bad as well. According to the mechanic there are degrees of 'bad' so the badder MAF coused the car to break down.... :?: ....whatever... car runs awesome now.
About the MAF... mine was bad for months I was just too lazy to replace it. Then I bought one on ebay that was bad as well. According to the mechanic there are degrees of 'bad' so the badder MAF coused the car to break down.... :?: ....whatever... car runs awesome now.
#9
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Glad you got that figured out. It almost had to be a sensor, based on the fact that it was having trouble when it went into closed loop. Good deal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post